I have never seen an Air Bud film
before. I didn’t think there would be much I had to learn. I sort of assumed a
film where a golden retriever is good at basketball wasn’t the kind of film
with massive implications for its sequels. The dog is good at basketball, he
wins a championship, move on. I didn’t even really think the second film would
be necessary to watch, the dog is great at American Football, he wins a
championship, again, move on. But once I was ten minutes into this film I
realized I was adrift in a sea of nineties hair and drunk clowns.
The plot is basically the same as the ones I’ve
listed above; replace Basketball or Football with Soccer and you’ve got the
basic idea. Throw in a forced love story between Air Bud and another golden retriever
and some nasty dog nappers and you have the entire film. It seems like pretty
typical kids movie fare; a dog farts, someone falls over, a child is precocious,
credits, but it’s not. It’s just not. The whole film feels wrong, just wrong,
the movement, the dialogue, the story. None of it seems natural in the
slightest
I don’t know if you’ve ever seen anyone try to improvise a story,
perhaps at some kind of theatre sports event, or, better yet, if you’ve ever
watched someone telling a particularly involved lie, but if you have, then you
should have a good idea of how this film moves from one sequence to the next. It
feels as though the director had all these sets and costumes, three days in
which to film, and literally no script. Every single line of dialogue feels
improvised. If I found out there was no script I would genuinely not be
surprised. It feels like they just put the actors in costume and yelled, “THIS
WOMAN IS DESIREABLE!” the instant before they started rolling. Less is more,
pretty much always, a good film is economical with its dialogue; it uses it for
exposition and character building in a way that seems genuine and natural. The
third film in the Air Bud saga treats dialogue like air freshener, heaping it
over everything and just hoping.
This film, at its core, is a film without charm. It’s not nice to watch
a film where everyone obviously doesn’t want to be there. The characters are
just big walking stereotypes, but they’re not even fully fledged examples of
that. A character that is just: ‘Nerdy Kid’ in big block letters is fine, I can
handle that; it can be great. But a character that is three lines of vaguely nerdy
dialogue and a painful joke about kilts is just offensive. The romantic
interest is a… well they say she’s British, but it’s either a South African or
perhaps even an Australian girl. They try to make her sound more English by
peppering her dialogue with awkward Briticisms like ‘Twit’ and, apparently, ‘Higgledy
Piggledy’, but it just makes the whole affair all the more painful to
experience. The dog nappers are lazily evil, they want to steal a dog. They
keep calling it a poodle, but it’s clearly not a poodle. I don’t know if this
is a joke. That, I mean that’s pretty much a microcosm of the film. Something
happens and I am at a loss as to whether it was intentional or just more
awkwardness.
I hate this film, with Ace Ventura Jr. I had some respect for the
goofiness of the whole affair, the cartoonish nonsense, the fat child channelling
Jim Carrey. This film is soulless though, no one is having a good time, things
happen and I don’t understand why they’re happening. So many subplots are occurring
at once that I genuinely had trouble keeping track of them. I’m going to try
and list them, let’s see: Romantic
Subplot for Lead Male, Romantic Subplot for Lead Dog, Awkward Step Father, New
Butler for Female Lead’s Father, Evil Dog Nappers, and Lead Dog becomes father.
That’s too many, like, at least five subplots too many. Come on Air Bud.
There’s so much more wrong with this film, so many things that just don’t
make sense, ninety-five percent of the first half is dogs moving from one place
to another, and the second half is basically just montages. Anything that’s not
one of the two is an awkward exchange of dialogue. I thought, when I first
became disturbed and confused, that maybe watching the rest of the Air Bud canon
would make at least some of this make sense, but now that it’s over I highly
doubt it. The very fact that this film went on to spawn at least ten sequels
and spin offs is absolutely mind blowing. How did Director Bill Bannerman
manage to make a hideous mess out of: Dog is good at Soccer and saves the day?
No comments:
Post a Comment